Outrageous ! Property Rights In the USA Opposed By Loretta Sanchez , but defends property rights in Communist Vietnam ...

H RES 340 Washington Post article Shows comprehensive voting record of Loretta Sanchez, and shows she voted ' present ' ( against ) H RES 340 protecting property rights from city abuse of eminent domain to sieze property from citizens to use for city commercial purposes. http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/s000030/votes/against-party/ David K


'Homes may be taken for private projects'See http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8331097/

GOOGLE - Case : Kilo Vs New London
Kelo v. City of New London

Docket: 04-108
Citation: 545 U.S. ___ (2005)
Petitioner: Susette Kelo, et al.
Respondent: City of New London, Connecticut, et al.
Case Media

Oral Argument
Briefs
Opinion Announcement
Docket
Written Opinion


Abstract

Granted: Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Argument: Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Decision: Thursday, June 23, 2005
Issues: Due Process, Takings Clause
Tags: Rehnquist: Miscellaneous, Rehnquist on iTunes U
Advocates
Scott G. Bullock (argued the cause for Petitioners)
Wesley W. Horton (argued the cause for Respondents)

Facts of the Case

New London, a city in Connecticut, used its eminent domain authority to seize private property to sell to private developers. The city said developing the land would create jobs and increase tax revenues. Kelo Susette and others whose property was seized sued New London in state court. The property owners argued the city violated the Fifth Amendment's takings clause......
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8331097/"

HOUSE BILL (Introduced in House)[H.RES.1264.IH]< SUPPORTING THE OPPOSITION
(KELO, FOR THIER PROPERTY RIGHTS) IN KELO VS NEW LONDON110th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. RES. 1264
Expressing support for the private property rights protections guaranteed by the 5th Amendment to the Constitution on the 3rd anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision on Kelo v. City of New London .

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 11, 2008

1 . Expressing support for the private property rights protections guaranteed by the 5th Amendment to the Constitution on the 3rd anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision on Kelo v.... (Introduced in House)[H.RES.1264.IH]LINK :http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c110:1:./temp/~c110WuiEY6::"

ALSO Beginning
January 4, 2007 Senate Bill S.48
Private Property Rights Protection Act (Introduced in Senate)

Sanchez votes against her own party in this matter, voting
' present' - not yes or no - see the vote here :strong>
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c110:2:./temp/~c110W1ntXI:e748:"



H RES 340 Washington Post article Shows comprehensive voting record of Loretta Sanchez, and shows she voted ' present ' ( against ) H RES 340 protecting property rights from city abuse of eminent domain to sieze property from citizens to use for city commercial purposes. LInk Below of comprehensive voting record of Loretta Sanchez, including 'present ' vote on H RES 340 :